{"id":200999,"date":"2026-06-11T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T08:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/non-categorise\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/"},"modified":"2026-06-11T10:00:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T08:00:00","slug":"atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"ATAD and interest limitation: what holding companies actually feel in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

Family holding companies still live under ATAD interest limitation 2026<\/strong> as a cash-tax constraint, not as a 2016 slogan. The European Union Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive has been on the books for a decade. In France the operating rule remains article 212 bis of the Code g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des imp\u00f4ts, in force since 1 January 2019. What holdings actually feel in 2026 is rarely a new statutory rate. It is interest that sits in a HoldCo with little fiscal EBITDA after the 2022-2024 rate shock, while cash still looks abundant at group level.<\/p>\n

This article is general information for families and family offices. It is not a tax opinion, a mandate, or personalized advice. Deductibility depends on the facts of each company, the group perimeter, and counsel who can read the return, the loan file, and the official comments together.<\/p>\n

What ATAD interest limitation 2026 is (and is not)<\/h2>\n

ATAD is a minimum-standard package, not a single French brochure. Council Directive 2016\/1164 (ATAD I)<\/a> required Member States to introduce five tools: an interest limitation rule, controlled foreign company (CFC) rules, a general anti-abuse rule (GAAR), exit taxation, and hybrid mismatch rules. ATAD II (Directive 2017\/952) then extended the hybrid chapter, including reverse hybrids. The 2019 French transposition of the interest limb is still the 2026 operating rule.<\/p>\n

The European Commission still presents the package on its Anti-Tax Avoidance Directive page<\/a>. That is orientation, not a substitute for the French article and the group\u2019s numbers. ATAD 3, often discussed as Unshell, remains a policy debate about substance in shell entities. It is not in force as a third interest-limitation rate, and this article does not invent an implementation date or a fake threshold for it. Adjacent wealth files such as the IFI 2026 taxable-wealth inventory<\/a> sit in a different chapter, but leverage, real estate, and holding charts still interact.<\/p>\n

Interest limitation in the holding, not in the brochure<\/h2>\n

The rule is felt where net financial expense lives, not where the family keeps its narrative. A pure holding with little operating profit, large intra-group interest, and a clean cash account can still hit the wall. Accounting EBITDA may look healthy at the operating company. Fiscal EBITDA at the HoldCo may be thin. The interest sits upstairs. The tax capacity sits downstairs. That mismatch is the 2026 holding problem.<\/p>\n

Families used leverage to extract cash from operating companies into HoldCos, fund distributions, buy the next asset, or equalize siblings without selling the firm. The economic story can be sound. The tax story is mechanical: interest is deductible only to the extent the company or integrated group has 212 bis capacity. Cash and upstream dividends do not create that capacity if HoldCo tax EBITDA stays small. The same pattern appears in family SPVs that buy real estate or private-equity interests with shareholder loans. Ownership is the \u201cbusiness.\u201d Tax EBITDA is often depreciation, a modest rental result, or almost nothing in a J-curve year. Vellum Finance treats this as a mapping problem: which entity bears the debt, which has fiscal EBITDA, and whether the loan is third-party or related-party.<\/p>\n

Article 212 bis: \u20ac3 million or 30% of fiscal EBITDA<\/h2>\n

For a standalone company that is not treated as undercapitalized, net financial expenses are deductible up to the higher of two amounts: \u20ac3 million, or 30% of fiscal EBITDA. Families compress that sentence into a slogan and then misapply it. A HoldCo with fiscal EBITDA of \u20ac2 million gets the higher of \u20ac3 million and \u20ac0.6 million, which is \u20ac3 million. A HoldCo with fiscal EBITDA of \u20ac20 million gets the higher of \u20ac3 million and \u20ac6 million. The floor helps smaller books. It does not rescue a highly levered holding whose net finance cost is a multiple of its tax EBITDA.<\/p>\n

Net financial expenses are not \u201cthe coupon on the bank line.\u201d French comments, and the practitioner summaries that track them, treat the net figure as financial expenses minus financial income, with a wide definition of what counts as a financing cost: interest, certain participating-loan amounts, guarantee and arrangement fees linked to borrowing, foreign-exchange items on interest, and similar items. The official text sits in article 212 bis CGI on L\u00e9gifrance<\/a>. A readable English digest of the same architecture appears in PwC\u2019s France corporate deductions summary<\/a>. Neither document replaces the return.<\/p>\n

Fiscal EBITDA versus accounting EBITDA<\/h3>\n

Fiscal EBITDA under article 212 bis II is not the EBITDA on the management pack. Families who paste a bank-covenant EBITDA into a tax memo invent capacity they do not have. The tax figure starts from taxable income and adds back, among other items, net financial expense itself and tax-deductible depreciation and provisions, with further adjustments for certain capital gains and losses. The point is not to recite every sub-paragraph. The point is that accounting add-backs, fair-value noise, and non-deductible items do not travel automatically into the 30% base.<\/p>\n

That is why a \u201cprofitable\u201d holding on IFRS or French GAAP can still be a poor interest host. Upstream dividends may be exempt or only partly taxed. Fair-value gains are not tax EBITDA. Impairments follow tax rules, not the board pack. Lender EBITDA and 212 bis EBITDA should disagree in writing, with a bridge.<\/p>\n

The overlays families actually hit (TMP, thin cap, related-party)<\/h2>\n

Article 212 bis is a ceiling on net financial expense. It is not the only test. Related-party interest is layered. Families who stop at \u201cwe are under \u20ac3 million\u201d still fail a rate test, a thin-capitalization test, or the tighter 212 bis overlay on undercapitalized related-party debt.<\/p>\n

Article 39, 1-3\u00b0 CGI caps the deductible rate on related-party interest by reference to the TMP, the average private-sector bond rate published for the period, unless the company can demonstrate that it could have obtained a higher rate from independent lenders. Excess over TMP is simply not deductible and never reaches 212 bis as a surviving expense. A shareholder loan priced \u201cat 8% because that is what private credit pays\u201d is a documentation file. The TMP test is older than ATAD and remains the first overlay many family SPVs hit in 2026.<\/p>\n

Older article 212 thin-capitalization rules remain in the stack for related-party debt. They are ratio tests, not a second copy of the 30% rule. Then comes the 212 bis undercapitalization overlay: when related-party debt is treated as excessive relative to equity, the related-party fraction of net financial expense often faces a tighter ceiling, commonly described as the higher of \u20ac1 million or 10% of fiscal EBITDA for that fraction. The third-party fraction can remain on the ordinary 30% \/ \u20ac3 million track, with prorating. The exact split follows the statute, not a dinner-table summary. What families should retain is the direction of travel: shareholder debt is the expensive layer.<\/p>\n

These tests stack. A loan can fail TMP, pass thin-cap, and still be clipped by 212 bis. Another can pass TMP, trip the 1.5 times equity related-party ratio, and then live under the \u20ac1 million \/ 10% overlay. Treating ATAD as a single number is how families discover disallowed interest after the accounts close.<\/p>\n

Groups, carry-forwards, and the equity-ratio condition<\/h2>\n

In a fiscally integrated group (int\u00e9gration fiscale), the 212 bis ceiling is computed at group level. That is a design feature, not a loophole. It can help when an operating company with real tax EBITDA sits in the same integrated perimeter as a levered holding. It does not help when the HoldCo is outside the group, in another Member State, or in a partnership perimeter that does not join the French integration. Chart hygiene therefore matters as much as the coupon.<\/p>\n

Disallowed interest under the standard French ATAD transposition is not lost. It carries forward indefinitely, subject to later capacity. Unused deduction capacity (the room between actual net financial expense and the ceiling) carries forward for five years. Families sometimes treat the indefinite carry-forward as equivalent to a deduction. It is not. A HoldCo that never grows tax EBITDA, and never joins a group that has tax EBITDA, can warehouse interest for a decade and still fail to use it. Carry-forwards are an inventory item. They are not a strategy by themselves.<\/p>\n

French comments also describe an equity-ratio escape, sometimes called a safeguard: a well-capitalized group member whose equity-to-asset ratio is not materially below that of the consolidated group (a two-percentage-point tolerance appears in the usual presentation) may claim an extra deduction equal to 75% of the net financial expense that the ordinary ceiling would have disallowed. This is a condition with consolidated accounts, consistent ratios, and an election discipline. It is not a marketing pitch for more shareholder debt. A family office that cannot produce a clean consolidated equity-to-asset bridge should not plan as if the 75% extra deduction were available.<\/p>\n

Refinancing after the rate shock<\/h2>\n

The 2022-2024 rate shock did not rewrite article 212 bis. It rewrote the numerator. The same principal, the same HoldCo, the same thin tax EBITDA, and a coupon that moved from 2% to 6% or 7% produces a larger net financial expense against an unchanged ceiling. That is the 2026 refinance file. Families who \u201conly refinanced\u201d often increased trapped interest without noticing, because cash still serviced the debt from operating dividends or from a new upstream loan.<\/p>\n

Refinancing also refreshes the TMP file. A 2021 related-party note that was inside TMP can sit outside it after a margin reset, or the reverse if the family failed to reprice when market rates rose. Independent-bank evidence, if used, must look like a credit process, not a recollection. Third-party bank debt that replaces shareholder paper may improve the related-party overlay and worsen cash covenants. There is a stack of tests to rerun, not a single \u201cbetter\u201d instrument. Substance belongs in the same memo. ATAD\u2019s interest rule does not ask whether the HoldCo has a receptionist; CFC, GAAR, and the Unshell debate do care about people, premises, and decisions. Official comments remain on BOFiP<\/a>. Families already working through the bouclier fiscal 2026 briefing<\/a> should put 212 bis on the same desk: one file is income-tax-plus-IFI mechanics, the other is whether interest is a deduction or a permanent difference.<\/p>\n

What a family office should inventory<\/h2>\n

A useful inventory is boring, and that is the point. List every entity that pays or receives interest. Flag related-party versus third-party. Capture principal, rate, TMP comparison, maturity, and whether the 2022-2024 refinance changed the coupon without changing the host. Compute, or obtain from tax counsel, fiscal EBITDA under 212 bis II, not accounting EBITDA. Note whether the company is in a French integrated group, and whether the ceiling is therefore group-level. Note unused capacity (five-year clock) and disallowed interest (indefinite clock) as two different schedules.<\/p>\n

Shareholder loans in family SPVs<\/h3>\n

Shareholder loans in real-estate and private-equity SPVs deserve their own line: the 1.5 times equity trigger, any attempt at the equity-ratio safeguard, and substance (directors, accounts, minutes). If the family cannot explain in one page why the interest lives in that company, the tax file will not explain it either. An independent multi-family office can keep that map current without selling a refinance. The Vellum Finance services<\/a> model is fee-only coordination among counsel, auditors, and lenders. The 2026 output is a single schedule: capacity, overlays, carry-forwards, and the entities where interest should no longer sit.<\/p>\n

Conclusion<\/h2>\n

ATAD interest limitation in 2026 is not a new European rate. It is the 2019 French operating rule meeting a higher coupon and a holding chart that still parks debt where tax EBITDA is scarce. Article 212 bis gives the higher of \u20ac3 million or 30% of fiscal EBITDA, then tightens for undercapitalized related-party debt, while TMP and older thin-cap tests continue to apply. Carry-forwards and the equity-ratio condition exist as conditions, not as slogans. Families who inventory hosts, fiscal EBITDA, and loan files will feel the rule as a managed constraint. Families who wait for a 2026 \u201cATAD reform\u201d that has not been enacted will feel it as trapped interest.<\/p>\n

Discretion. Stability. Prosperity.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Family holding companies still live under ATAD interest limitation 2026 as a cash-tax constraint, not as a 2016 slogan. The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":201002,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[112],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-200999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-insights-education"],"yoast_head":"\nATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Vellum Finance & Patrimoine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-06-11T08:00:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1920\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1080\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Team Vellum\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@VellumFinance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@VellumFinance\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Team Vellum\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings","description":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings","og_description":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.","og_url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/","og_site_name":"Vellum Finance & Patrimoine","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/","article_published_time":"2026-06-11T08:00:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1920,"height":1080,"url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Team Vellum","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings","twitter_description":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","twitter_creator":"@VellumFinance","twitter_site":"@VellumFinance","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Team Vellum","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/"},"author":{"name":"Team Vellum","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4f8013d516757f8263b9223f9089337d"},"headline":"ATAD and interest limitation: what holding companies actually feel in 2026","datePublished":"2026-06-11T08:00:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/"},"wordCount":1934,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","articleSection":["Insights & Education"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/","url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/","name":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 for holdings","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","datePublished":"2026-06-11T08:00:00+00:00","description":"ATAD interest limitation 2026 still binds family holdings via article 212 bis: EUR 3 million or 30 percent of fiscal EBITDA, plus TMP rate overlays.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/08\/cover-v012-atad-2026.jpg","width":1920,"height":1080,"caption":"Article 212 bis still caps net financial expense in family HoldCos in 2026."},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/insights-education\/atad-interest-limitation-holding-companies-2026\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"ATAD and interest limitation: what holding companies actually feel in 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/","name":"Vellum Finance & Patrimoine","description":"Discr\u00e9tion. Stabilit\u00e9. Prosp\u00e9rit\u00e9.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#organization","name":"Vellum Finance & Patrimoine","url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Vellum_LogoL_dark.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/11\/Vellum_LogoL_dark.png","width":664,"height":243,"caption":"Vellum Finance & Patrimoine"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/","https:\/\/x.com\/VellumFinance","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/vellumfinance\/","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/vellum-finance-patrimoine\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@VellumFinance"],"description":"Bespoke wealth advisory for middle-class & affluent clients. We focus on secure, compliant strategies for legacy planning, global diversification & steady growth; preserving your family\u2019s future with confidence, stability & discretion.","email":"info@vellumfinance.com","telephone":"+33652480296","legalName":"Vellum Finance et Patrimoine","foundingDate":"2025-08-29","numberOfEmployees":{"@type":"QuantitativeValue","minValue":"1","maxValue":"10"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/4f8013d516757f8263b9223f9089337d","name":"Team Vellum","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e5bd3be38241723f8381779d67f207ce4daf63a8f78254fddf4d3809611e02fd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e5bd3be38241723f8381779d67f207ce4daf63a8f78254fddf4d3809611e02fd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e5bd3be38241723f8381779d67f207ce4daf63a8f78254fddf4d3809611e02fd?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Team Vellum"},"description":"A team of passionate professionals who combine their expertise to bring knowledge through Vellum Finance & Patrimoine blog articles. Each member writes about their own field of expertise, cross referencing with our colleagues own fields to ensure the highest quality of information possible in all our content.","sameAs":["https:\/\/vellumfinance.com","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/vellumfinance\/","https:\/\/instagram.com\/vellumfinance","http:\/\/linkedin.com\/company\/vellum-finance-patrimoine","https:\/\/x.com\/VellumFinance"],"knowsLanguage":["Anglais","Fran\u00e7ais","Espagnol","Ukrainien"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=200999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/200999\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/201002"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=200999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=200999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/vellumfinance.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=200999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}